Skip to main content

Wireshark twoo twooo two twoo... picoCTF 2021 Solution

Sift through a noisy packet capture full of red herrings to identify and extract the real flag data.

Published: April 2, 2026Updated: August 25, 2026

Description

Can you find the flag in this packet capture? Download shark2.pcapng.

Download the pcap file and open it in Wireshark.

bash
wget <url>/shark2.pcapng

Solution

Want to try it yourself first?

The guided walkthrough reveals hints one step at a time.

Walk me through it
  1. Step 1Filter for DNS queries from the client
    Observation
    The description hides the flag inside network traffic, and the name hints at repetition. That points at an exfiltration channel on a high-volume protocol, and DNS is the obvious candidate: rarely blocked, and its query names carry arbitrary text.
    Apply 'dns.flags.response == 0' in Wireshark to keep only outbound queries. The flag is exfiltrated character by character through DNS query subdomains, not through DNS responses.
    bash
    wireshark shark2.pcapng
    What didn't work first

    Tried: Look for the flag in HTTP or TCP streams using 'Follow Stream' in Wireshark

    The pcap contains no HTTP traffic carrying the flag. Focusing on TCP/HTTP streams produces empty or unrelated results because the exfiltration channel is DNS, not a transport-layer stream. The correct approach is to switch to DNS traffic and inspect query names.

    Tried: Apply 'dns.flags.response == 1' to look at DNS responses for the flag

    DNS responses carry resolver-generated A or NXDOMAIN records back to the client, never the attacker's data. The encoded chunks sit in the query name of outbound queries, not in any answer section, so filtering for responses shows the wrong direction entirely.

    Learn more

    DNS exfiltration. DNS traffic is allowed almost everywhere, so attackers encode data into subdomain names of queries to a domain they control. The authoritative name server logs the queries and reconstructs the data later.

    Why dns.flags.response == 0. DNS packets come in pairs: the query (flags.response = 0, sent by the client) and the response (flags.response = 1, sent by the resolver). The exfil data is typed by the attacker into the query name. The response carries only an A/NXDOMAIN record back. Keeping only queries halves the noise and ensures you don't double-count the same hostname when it appears in both the question and answer sections.

  2. Step 2Order, concatenate, and base64-decode the subdomains
    Observation
    Each filtered query name has a varying first label built from the base64 alphabet. Those labels are base64 chunks, so join them in capture order and decode.
    Sort queries by frame.time so they're in the order the client sent them. Pull the first label from each hostname, concatenate, and base64-decode.
    bash
    # Dump query names in capture order:
    tshark -r shark2.pcapng -Y 'dns.flags.response == 0' -T fields -e frame.time -e dns.qry.name
    bash
    # Strip the base domain, take the leading label, join, b64decode:
    tshark -r shark2.pcapng -Y 'dns.flags.response == 0' -T fields -e dns.qry.name \
      | grep -v 'in-addr\|local' \
      | awk -F'.' '{print $1}' \
      | tr -d '\n' \
      | base64 -d

    Expected output

    picoCTF{dns_3xf1l_ftw_...}
    What didn't work first

    Tried: Pipe the tshark output through 'sort -u' before joining to remove duplicate query names

    Sorting the labels scrambles the transmission order, so the concatenated base64 is corrupted and base64 -d gives garbage or an error. The chunks have to stay in capture order, and tshark already emits packets in frame order, so stripping newlines is all that is needed.

    Tried: Use 'awk -F. {print $2}' to grab the second label instead of the first

    The second label is the start of the attacker's base domain, the same constant string in every packet, carrying no flag data at all. Only the first label changes per packet, and that is where the encoded chunk lives.

    Learn more

    Why split on the first label. Each query name looks like cGljb0NU.attacker.com. The leading label (before the first .) is the encoded chunk; everything after is the attacker's base domain and is the same for every packet. awk -F'.' '{print $1}' isolates the chunk.

    Why concatenate without a separator. Each chunk is one piece of a base64-encoded message. Joining them as one continuous string gives the original base64 blob; decode it with base64 -d to get the flag.

    Order matters. Use frame.time rather than sort: the chunks were sent in transmission order, not lexicographic order. tshark output is already in capture order by default, so a plain tr -d '\n' preserves it. Avoid piping through sort -u (it scrambles order and can drop legitimate duplicates).

    See Wireshark for CTF for the broader pcap workflow and CTF encodings for base64 alongside the rest of the encoding zoo.

Interactive tools
  • Hex ViewerView text or raw hex bytes as a xxd-style hex dump with byte offset, hex columns, and ASCII sidebar. Highlights printable characters and null bytes.
  • Strings ExtractorPull printable text from any binary, library, or image. ASCII and UTF-16 detection, configurable minimum length, flag-like highlight, no command line needed.
Alternate Solution

Once you concatenate the Base64 subdomain chunks, decode them with the Base64 Decoder on this site. Paste the joined string and the flag appears without needing a terminal.

Flag

Reveal flag

picoCTF{dns_3xf1l_ftw_...}

The flag was exfiltrated via DNS queries with base64-encoded subdomains, a classic covert channel that bypasses firewall restrictions on other protocols.

Key takeaway

DNS exfiltration works because DNS is almost universally allowed outbound, even on networks that block HTTP, FTP, and every other data channel. Encode a payload into the subdomain labels of queries to a domain you control and the data leaves without tripping a single port-based rule. Defenders catch it through DNS anomaly monitoring: unusually long labels, heavy query volume to one domain, or base64-like character distributions in query names.

Related reading

Useful tools for Forensics

Where to go next